IT袋

当前位置:主页 > 经验教程 > 硬件教程 >

如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题

如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题(3)

时间:2024-03-12 18:00:25 来源:IT袋 作者:马勇
导读:如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题,Tried to tweak table_open_cache_instances to affect this? 查询此参数描述: A value of 8 or 16 is recommended on systems that routinely use 16 or more cores. However, if you have many large tri

如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题

如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题

Tried to tweak table_open_cache_instances to affect this?

查询此参数描述:

如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题

A value of 8 or 16 is recommended on systems that routinely use 16 or more cores. However, if you have many large triggers on your tables that cause a high memory load, the default setting for table_open_cache_instances might lead to excessive memory usage. In that situation, it can be helpful to set table_open_cache_instances to 1 in order to restrict memory usage.

根据官方的解释可以了解到,如果有许多大的触发器,参数table_open_cache_instances的默认值可能会造成内存使用过多。

比如table_open_cache_instances设置为 16,那么表缓存会划分为 16 个table instance。当并发访问大时,最多的情况下一个表的缓存信息会出现在每一个table instance里面。

再有每次将表信息放入表缓存时,所有关联的触发器都被放入memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root中,table_open_cache_instances设置的越大其所占内存也就越大,以及存储过程也会消耗更多的内存,所以导致内存一直上升最终导致 OOM。

下面简单验证一下触发器对内存的影响。

table_open_cache_instances为 8 时:
#清空缓存
mysql> flush tables;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
[root@test ~]# cat test.sh
for i in `seq 1 1 8`
do
mysql -uroot -p test -e "select * from test;"
done
[root@test ~]# sh test.sh
mysql> show variables like '%table_open_cache_instances%';
+----------------------------+-------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+----------------------------+-------+
| table_open_cache_instances | 8 |
+----------------------------+-------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> SELECT current_alloc FROM sys.memory_global_by_current_bytes WHERE event_name='memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root';
+---------------+
| current_alloc |
+---------------+
| 119.61 KiB |
+---------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

在该表上创建一个触发器。

mysql> \d|
mysql> CREATE TRIGGER trigger_test BEFORE INSERT ON test FOR EACH ROW BEGIN SIGNAL SQLSTATE '45000' SET message_text='Very long string. MySQL stores table descriptors in a special memory buffer, calle
'> at holds how many table descriptors MySQL should store in the cache and table_open_cache_instances t
'> hat stores the number of the table cache instances. So with default values of table_open_cache=4000
'> and table_open_cache_instances=16, you will have 16 independent memory buffers that will store 250 t
'> able descriptors each. These table cache instances could be accessed concurrently, allowing DML to u
'> se cached table descriptors without locking each other. If you use only tables, the table cache doe
'> s not require a lot of memory, because descriptors are lightweight, and even if you significantly increased the value of table_open_cache, it would not be so high. For example, 4000 tables will take u
'> p to 4000 x 4K = 16MB in the cache, 100.000 tables will take up to 390MB that is also not quite a hu
'> ge number for this number of open tables. However, if your tables have triggers, it changes the gam
'> e.'; END|
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
#清空缓存
mysql> flush tables;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

然后访问表,查看缓存。

[root@test ~]# cat test.sh
for i in `seq 1 1 8`
do
mysql -uroot -p test -e "select * from test;"
done
[root@test ~]# sh test.sh
mysql> SELECT current_alloc FROM sys.memory_global_by_current_bytes WHERE event_name='memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root';
+---------------+
| current_alloc |
+---------------+
| 438.98 KiB |
+---------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

可以发现memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root明显增长较大。如果有很多大的触发器,那么所占内存就不可忽视(现场环境触发器里面很多是调用了存储过程)。

table_open_cache_instances为 1 时:
mysql> flush tables;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> show variables like '%table_open_cache_instances%';
+----------------------------+-------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+----------------------------+-------+
| table_open_cache_instances | 1 |
+----------------------------+-------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
SELECT current_alloc FROM sys.memory_global_by_current_bytes WHERE event_name='memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root';
+---------------+
| current_alloc |
+---------------+
| 119.61 KiB |
+---------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> #访问表
mysql> system sh test.sh
mysql> SELECT current_alloc FROM sys.memory_global_by_current_bytes WHERE event_name='memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root';
+---------------+
| current_alloc |
+---------------+
| 159.53 KiB |
+---------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

可以发现memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root所占内存增长较小。

由于大量触发器会导致表缓存和 memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root 占用更多的内存,根据实际环境,尝试把该从库的 table_open_cache_instances 修改为 1 后观察情况。

如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题

可以看到内存值趋于稳定,未再次出现内存使用率异常的问题。

3、总结

  1. MySQL 中不推荐使用大量的触发器以及复杂的存储过程。
  2. table_open_cache_instances设置为 1 时,在高并发下会影响 SQL 的执行效率。本案例的从库并发量不高,其他场景请根据实际情况进行调整。
  3. 触发器越多会导致memory/sql/sp_head::main_mem_root占用的内存越大,存储过程所使用的内存也会越大。
  4. 本文只是给出了解决内存溢出的一个方向,具体的底层原理请自行探索。

上面IT袋网为您介绍的如何解决由触发器导致mysql内存溢出问题的详细内容了,IT袋网网希望能给您带来帮助!

相关阅读